Answer:
For the first, I would say being poorly represented.
For the second, ignorance and morals.
Explanation:
A lot of people have been raised to demand a change when they see injustices, some might go at it in a violent way, others might approach it in a more peaceful way. One thing you have to know about making big decisions, is that you will never please everyone. Someone is always going to be mad. It depends on their moral values as people. If you saw something that you thought was morally wrong, you would be upset too. They have tried peaceful protests and weren't heard, now they choose to incite violence because they have a voice and are represented in the media that way.
It all leads down to morals. The media says that if you aren't for it, you're automatically against it. If something the media does or activists do doesn't allign with people's morals, they choose the complete opposite because they think that's their only option.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: " Mexican-american war and the California joining the union as a state." The two events that fueled the debate over slavery between 1846-1850 are the Mexican-american war and the <span>California joining the union as a state.</span>
Answer:
If you go to
Sandboxxhttps://www.sandboxx.us
and look for: The miracle on ice was more than a hockey game.
You will find your answer(s) there.
Explanation:
Hope that this helps! :) It's too much for me to put here.
Answer:
ok
Explanation:
joe mama !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
in his Fireside Chat after the attack on pearl harbor, FDR increase American's confidence in the ability of the United States to win the war against the axis powers by explaining how the United State military has become stronger since World War II first began, to show the confidence in U.S Army forces.
Two days after Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese, President Franklin D. Roosevelt delivered his Fireside Chat to the Americans to get the nation ready for the battle that was to come and with the main message of the speech was to gather the necessary support of the citizens and wanted his audience to extract hope from his speech, despite the difficulties of the presence situation.
