Ya know what the gym did you put for the first week in the short drive through it
Answer:
$6.91 per direct labor hour
Explanation:
Given that,
Estimated direct labor = $2,640,000
Estimated direct labor hours = 220,000
Factory overhead = $1,520,000
Actual overhead costs = $1,220,000
Therefore,
Predetermined overhead rate:
= Estimated overhead cost ÷ Estimated direct labor hours
= $1,520,000 ÷ 220,000 hours
= $6.91 per direct labor hour
Answer:
The true statement about the Siemens bribery scandal is:
b The CEO was involved and condoned it.
Explanation:
The 2008 Siemens scandal was an organized and deliberate effort by the company to bribe government officials in order to secure supply contracts from national governments. It was a worldwide act perpetrated by senior management officials with a long-term pattern. The massive bribery attracted a fine of $160 billion. It seems that bribery is an "embedded business culture in the company."
Answer:
Your eligible to take care of your self and pay things you have going on including: Depth, Late payment, Rent
Explanation:
Answer:
Investment Opportunity 1 has a few risks.Though it invests in stocks, it makes consistent profits. It lacks volatility because managers carefully select stocks with long-term earning potential. Investment Opportunity 2 risks are related to changing interest rates, which can cause bonds to make less money for bondholders. Also, it may be affected by inflation, and it carries the risk of default: if a city or county government fails to make its bond payments, then the bondholder loses money. Both companies tell you the risks, and they have the same level of it. Investment Opportunity 1 has three documents to illustrate the fund’s risks and returns over the past five years.The first graph lists how a hypothetical investment of $10,000 fared over those five years. The second graph lists an overall earnings percentage for four different earnings periods. The final graphic shows how the company rates the level of risk. Investment Opportunity 2 also provided three documents to illustrate the fund’s risks and returns over the past five years. The first graph lists how a hypothetical investment of $10,000 fared over those five years. The second graph lists an overall earnings percentage for four different earnings periods. The final graphic shows how the company rates the level of risk. Both say the potential returns of each investment, but investment opportunity 1 hypothetical investment of $10,000 fared over those five years is not as steady as investment opportunity 2. Investment Opportunity 2 is the fraudulent one because its percentage of return is better than investment opportunity 1. Both are with large companies that are almost just alike but investment opportunity 2 has a better rates of return. The first one serves thousands of customers and specializes in managing stocks and mutual funds. The second firm serves thousands of customers, and it specializes in managing mutual funds that invest in bonds.
Explanation: Hope this helps this is what I used for <u>Edge 2020</u> ^-^. Also I do not take credit for this answer, but I feel like this is a very well and detailed answer.