Answer: $74,102
Explanation:
FICA Tax Payable by Employer = 1.45% × $185,000 + 7.65% × ($1,020,000 - $185000)
= $2,682.5 + $63,877.5
= $66,560
State unemployment tax = 1% × ($1,020,000 - $601,000)
= $4,190
Federal unemployment tax = 0.8% × ($1,020,000 - $601,000)
= $3,352
Payroll tax expense = FICA Tax Payable by Employer + state unemployment tax + federal unemployment tax
= $66,560 + $4,190 + $3,352
= $74,102
Answer:
When comparing the real estate market of any region or state, there are factors for consideration:
a) Population size
b) Employment status
c) Real estate market
d) Renting strength
e) Price
f) Quality in terms of home structure and a serene environment.
Explanation:
In the question, there are two American cities up for comparison: The city of Pittsburgh and the Philadelphia city, both in the Pennsylvania region. Both cities have comfortable environments which are habitable but here, we have to choose or rather compare both. The first factor is the population size. The two cities which are in the same region, have a considerable population size but when compared, Philadelphia has the upper hand. In real estate business, population is key as a region which a better and fuller population is appreciated more. The second factor is the employment status of the inhabitants. The employment status of these two cities are commendable but Pittsburgh is quite flabbergasting. The employment rate of Pittsburgh to Philadelphia is up to 57%. Employment status is a key determinant when real estate market is mentioned because employed persons are the ones who can actually pay when due. The third factor is the real estate market. This is another factor which is very important in determining the cities' real estate market. Over the years, Philadelphia has shown positive signs of a healthy real estate market which nicks that of Pittsburgh. Other factors listed above have clearly been favourable to Philadelphia because of their location but in terms of price, Pittsburgh appears cheaper with an average price of $1258 compared to Philadelphia's $1,652.
The economics concepts of income effect and substitution effect express changes in the market and how these changes impact consumption patterns for consumer goods and services. The income effect expresses the impact of increased purchasing power on consumption, while the substitution effect describes how consumption is impacted by changing relative prices. Different goods and services experience these changes in different ways. Some products, called inferior goods, generally decrease in consumption whenever incomes increase. Consumer spending and consumption of normal goods typically increases with higher purchasing power, in contrast with inferior goods.
Read more: What's the difference between the income effect and the substitution effect? | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/041415/whats-difference-between-income-effect-and-substitution-effect.asp#ixzz4wcsy3IOK
Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook
Answer:
Representative democracy.
Explanation:
Representative democracy refers to a system where the people govern through the election of parties or representatives with decision-making rights. Representative democracy can also be seen as a collective term for a number of democratic models. Common to these, however, is that the core consists of regularly recurring elections between competing representatives. People's sovereignty is achieved by the citizens influencing the government by voting in these elections. It is by far the most widespread method of exercising authoritative and legitimate control, demanding responsibility and developing debate in modern democracies.
Answer:
Note: <em>The complete question is attached as picture below</em>
1a. The one year spot rate can be calculated using the one year zero bond.
PV * (1 + S1) = FV
1 + S1 = 1000 / 900
S1 = 1.1111 - 1
S1 = 0.1111
S1 = 11.11%
1b. PV of the 2 year bond = $950
Annual coupon = 1000 * 5% = $50
950 = 50 / (1 + S1) + (50 + 1000) / (1 + S2)^2
950 = 50 / 1.1111 + 1,050 / (1 + S2)^2
1,050/ (1 + S2)^2 = 950 - 45 = 905
(1 + S2)^2 = 1050 / 905
1 + S2 = 1.160221/2
S2 = 7.714%
1c. Price of the 2 year zero bond = 1,000 / (1 + 0.07714)^2
Price of the 2 year zero bond = 1,000 / 1.1602
Price of the 2 year zero bond = 861.9203586
Price of the 2 year zero bond = $861.92
