Answer:
Explanation:
I don't think it's possible to make a bad speech about 9/11. I married an American who was at home getting ready to go to work when it happened. We don't watch television. We're both too busy. But we have one. I phoned home at somewhere around 8:00 or 9:00 and told her she could be a little late, but she had to turn on the TV. She didn't want to do but I insisted. So she did it. I saw her an hour later. There were streak marks coming away from her eyes.
She didn't say much. She just said "Who would want to do that? Why did they do it?"
That's basically all she had to say.
President Bush was saying much the same thing. In general that's the way most people responded. There was shock and there were tears. The indignation and anger came later. But for a bit, everybody was a New Yorker trying to make out what happened. Trying to sympathize.
Just trying to feel the horror that befell them.
Answer:
Fremont opposes the practice of slavery in the territories.
The animal that changed their ways was the horse.
Answer:
a. The book looked at political leadership in a realistic rather than idealistic way.
Explanation:
This treatise is a work of art, since I analyze with realism the political and social situation that was lived at that time, it lists different qualities that a leader must have and at the same time because he must have them, he breaks with the idea of what King or prince is someone glorious and who must be loved for having that title, shows the human of politics and the wide difference between moral and immoral
