The answer to this depends on what sources you are using, but some sources state that people identify lies only 55% of the time!
That's very little, considering that 50% is the chance level - this number would be the one used if we could never really use our intuition to guess correctly. For example if we guessed that every second person randomly lies that would give us the "chance level" of 50 %. (if exactly half of the people lied).
And in real life, we can tell 55% of the time if people are lying - this means we are slightly better than chance.
We can conclude from this that we should never trust our intuition about whether people lie or not!
Answer:
Syntax.
Explanation:
What Syntax studies is the principles and processes of sentences in a particular language, including the word order. In this case, the sentences "The dog chased the cat" and "The cat chased the dog" mean different things because of the word order: The dog chased the cat means that the dog was running behind the cat, after him. If the cat chased the dog, the opposite. In this simple example we notice the importance of syntax and the word order in a sentence. It's not the same if we say "The man was helped by the medic" rather than "The medic was helped by the man" even if it shares the exact same words.
Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
Answer:
Middle voter theorem
Explanation:
Middle voter theorem is a theory on which most of the election depend. it stated that party that have median voter is going to be in power.
The two assumption on which Middle voter theorem depend is given below:
1) All the party candidate for particular constituencies are place along one side of political spectrum
2) voter's have only preference to pick best from all given candidates list.
