Answer:
Difficult but if you are try it will be easier to you
Answer:
A technological choice
Explanation:
Here, what you care about is taking the dollar home in form of cash not necessarily the free lunch in the restaurants. This is an example of technological choice.
Stan and Tammy will share the estate in equal shares. You are able to have as many beneficiaries as you name, due to this and no change in the first will, both will be heirs to the estate. If Ruth were to have revoked the first will, then it would have left Tammy the sole beneficiary.
Hello <span>Gabbypittman20!
Answer:This answer is very tricky...but at least you have a teacher to help you.
</span><span>The answer to this question would
buy new clothes before buying a computer. Explanation:
See, this is a Need or want question. You NEED clothes but you WANT a computer. Get it? contact me for more information.
FLVS teacher,
~Sarah Bunkly
</span>
Answer:
a) If bribes cost $1,000 each, how much will a housing inspector make each year in bribes?
So, if the corrupt inspector approves two newly built structures each week, ti means that he is bribed twice per week. There are 52 weeks in a year, so he gets a total of 104 bribes (52 x 2). If each bribe costs $1,000, then he makes a total of: $1,000 x 104 = $104,000 in bribes per year.
c) Corrupt officials may have an incentive to reduce the provision of government services to help line their own pockets.
This statement is true. Corrupt officials will want to have private companies they can obtain bribes from provide government services. It increases the probability of them making money from bribes.
d) What if reducing the number of inspectors from 20 to 10 only increased the equilibrium bribe from $1,000 to $1,500?
Reducing the number of inspectors in hafl means that each inspector now gets twice the bribes. Because the equilibrium price did not double as did the quantity of bribes, each inspector will make less money than expected, but they will still the incentive to collect all the four bribes per week.
