Truman’s policy was more defensive than offensive. This can be seen in the Marshall Plan where he used economically to rebuild war-torn as an incentive to promote democracy. Though he would not use military force, He vowed to support countries against communism and this was seen in the establishment of NATO as a deterrent to Russian expansion.
Answer:
On the night of November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall—the most potent symbol of the cold-war division of Europe—came down. Earlier that day, the Communist authorities of the German Democratic Republic had announced the removal of travel restrictions to democratic West Berlin. Thousands of East Germans streamed into the West, and in the course of the night, celebrants on both sides of the wall began to tear it down.
The collapse of the Berlin Wall was the culminating point of the revolutionary changes sweeping East Central Europe in 1989. Throughout the Soviet bloc, reformers assumed power and ended over 40 years of dictatorial Communist rule. The reform movement that ended communism in East Central Europe began in Poland. Solidarity, an anti-Communist trade union and social movement, had forced Poland’s Communist government to recognize it in 1980 through a wave of strikes that gained international attention. In 1981, Poland’s Communist authorities, under pressure from Moscow, declared martial law, arrested Solidarity’s leaders, and banned the democratic trade union. The ban did not bring an end to Solidarity. The movement simply went underground, and the rebellious Poles organized their own civil society, separate from the Communist government and its edicts.
Explanation:
Because non-communist governments wanted to control its spread, and prevent other countries from becoming communist. I guess because communism's style of governance is unfair to some.
Answer:
1. imperialism, slavery, mercantilism
2. Europe saw the colonies as a source of income and profit, usinf the univesal role of mercantilism, trade generates wealth and is stimulated by the accumulation of profitable balances, which a government should encourage by means of protectionism. and the natives of the land would get them those resorses for trade.
3. they often times gave benefits to natives that would convert to christianity.
4. the forces people to asimmalte to their culture by teaching them their sports, language, religion, ect. and refusal to do so could result in punishments however willingness to do so resulted in benefits
5. they will most likley come to hold distane upon them for the passed and making them assimalate to their culture and not allowing them to keep their native culture.
6. (i cant find the video but it should be stated if you look back through)
7. in hati they had more nations involded namley france and spain where as mexico only had to worry about spain. and in mexico they were led by a minister while in hati they were led by a former war hero and slave.
