The correct answer is settling disputes between striking workers and business owners
The labor unions have as their main objective the defense of the economic, professional, social and political interests of their members. The workers unions are also responsible for organizing strikes and demonstrations aimed at improving the wage and working conditions of the category.
<span>Most states choose a bicameral
legislature rather than a unicameral legislature because the objective to balance
the power of the common people with that of the wealthy and well-educated is
clearly evident. Bicameral legislature has a government with two lawmaking
houses which are the Senate and the House of Representatives. Having a bicameral
legislature gives the citizens some advantages. One is, this is applicable in
federal states. This means that if the units are not equal in size or
population, there is a chamber which will give balance to that inequality. It is
in the second chamber that all states are equally represented irrespective of
their size or population. Second, after
the bill has been passed in the first chamber, it will then proceed to the
second for them to have a second look. When the second chamber finds that something
is not right, it will go back to the first chamber for it to be corrected
before it will continue to become a law. Another advantage is that a bicameral
kind of government prevents dictatorship to rule. One chamber will check if everything
is still on track. The bicameral
government also shows that since people with diverse backgrounds, experience
and expertise are allowed to serve in the second chamber, the opportunity is
open to a wide range of people to take part in the government. </span>
I believe you are referring to the 1755 Lisbon earthquake.
On November 1, 1755, the greater area of Lisbon was destroyed by an earthquake, which was followed by a tidal wave which destroyed the shipping in the river Tagus. Around sixty thousand people have lost their lives.
This occurrence sparked a lot of discussions involving both religious and philosophical questions. Two main point of views are Voltaire's and Rousseau's.
Voltaire examined evil and suffering related to the disaster. He had made the connection before, pondering onto previous earthquakes, such as prior earthquakes in China, Lima and Callao. He thought that God's rules were not meant for man's best good, asking if it has been the will of God or if could it have been vengeance. He also reflected on why Lisbon, if Lisbon was worse than other cities and if there were worse sins or more evil in Lisbon than other cities. Finally asking if god is the culprit of these catastrophes, even though he is supposed to be love and kindness.
Rousseau on the other hand had more systematic views of the world and man. Rousseau believed man is good by nature but is corrupted in contact with other men, the only solution being to return to nature. Rousseau represented the optimism views and and considered Voltaire's poem on the Lisbon earthquake both a personal attack on him and a lack of understanding and distortion of God's preponderant action.
The common ground is that neither one of them were atheists, both believed that God existed, but diverged on the nature of naturally good (Rousseau) and evil (Voltaire).
Answer:
The Bill of Rights, Constitution
Explanation:
