Answer:
Pro: Getting your voice heard, and swaying the public opinion about the war efforts.
Con: Decrease the morale of the soldiers who are already stationed, if the protest is negative, and the government may keep an eye on you as well.
Explanation:
When it comes to protesting against a war that is already ongoing, it could go either way, as to whether or not the protest would have the intended impact. If the war has been going for a long time and there isn't exactly a clear reason as to why it is still going on, public opinion tend to be more sympathetic - for example: Vietnam War protests. However, just like during the Vietnam War, it can damage the morale of the soldiers who are already there and as history has proven, the government might put you on the list of people-to-watch - just like past celebrities who have protested against the Vietnam War such as Jane Fonda.
The queen decides who is the prime minister
It is challenging to apply the test of the truthfulness of the premises to ideological arguments because Ideologies offer a truth that people, both the privileged and the underprivileged, want to hear, but they are neither true nor untrue. Instead, they are a collection of socially conditioned beliefs. In the 1920s, a different iteration of the critical viewpoint of ideology and law began to impact American jurisprudence.
<h3>What is the purpose of ideologies?</h3>
An ideology's major goal is to promote social change or adherence to a set of values when there is already conformity through a normative cognitive process. Politics revolves around the idea of ideologies, which are systems of abstract thought applied to public issues.
Ideological reasoning is a sort of reasoning that is based on an individual's views and is frequently skewed in favor of the individual's preferences. Ideological reasoning occupies a higher position, and when the cause is just, it can aid a person in achieving unimaginable success.
Learn more about Ideologies here:
brainly.com/question/24353091
#SPJ4
