Answer:
<u>Part(a) Differential analysis as at February 24</u>
Make (Alternative 1) :
Direct Materials $35.00
Direct labor $18.00
Variable Overheads $2.70
Fixed Overheads $0.00
Total Make Costs $55.70
Buy (Alternative 2) :
Total Purchase Cost $59.00
<u>(b) On the basis of the data presented, would it be advisable to make the carrying cases or continue buying them? </u>
It is clear that from comparison of the cost of Purchase and the Cost of Making the Carrying Cases, the Cost of Making the Carrying Cases is lower than the Cost of Purchasing the Cases by $3.30
It is thus advisable to make carrying cases instead of buying them
Explanation:
Total Make Costs;
The Factory fixed overheads are irrelevant to this decision hence they were ignored in the make cost calculations.
Answer:
The amount of the prepaid portion that is due back to Ashley using the 12 month, 360 day proration is=$362.34
Explanation:
<em>Step 1: Determine HOA per day</em>
Use the expression below to determine HOA per day;
T=H×N
where;
T=total HOA dues per year
H=HOA per day
N=number of days in a year
In our case;
T=$660
H=unknown
N=360 days
Replacing;
660=H×360
360 H=660
H=660/360
H=$1.83 per day
<em>Step 2: Determine amount of HOA that is due back</em>
Using the same expression;
T=H×N
but;
T=unknown
H=$1.83 per day
N=(June, 15 days)+(July, 30)+(Aug, 31)+(Sep. 30)+(Oct 31)+(Nov 30)+(Dec 31)
N=(15+30+31+30+31+30+31)=198 days
Replacing;
T=(1.83×198)=$362.34
The amount of the prepaid portion that is due back to Ashley using the 12 month, 360 day proration is=$362.34
Two questions:
what is the confidence level we are looking at?
also the p-value of .240.24? Is that a mistake in typing or is it .240 to the 24 decimal?
Generally, if the p-value is less than the confidence level (alpha) you reject the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis here is that the ads didn't nothing to help.
For instance, if the p-value were .240 and the alpha was .05 you would reject the null hypothesis and say that the ads may have had an effect on the outcome.
Answer:
heidbsuavysbhs kaokwosjwhs
There are ways to control different situations. The dimensions of situational control Fiedler's contingency theory are leader-member relations, task structure, and position power.
Fiedler's is popularly known for his contingency theory. This theory helps to understand why managers can behave so differently.
The contingency theory states that there no one single leadership style often works for all employees.
He stated also that there are situational-contingent elements that influences a leader's ability to lead.
Learn more about Fiedler's contingency theory from
brainly.com/question/14615424
