Answer:
The correct answer is d. The referral is court mandated.
Explanation:
When the main purpose of the call is to communicate information issued by a court, the person who should receive such communication must be the client directly, since their right to privacy must be respected, taking into account that for legal purposes it is important to maintain confidentiality. of the information. If there is the express will of the client to delegate a third person to receive the information, the conditions change because there is a consent that must be respected by the court.
Answer:
Explanation:
Commutative laws: p ∧ q ≡ q ∧ p
p ∨ q ≡ q ∨ p
Associative laws: (p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)
(p ∨ q) ∨ r ≡ p ∨ (q ∨ r)
Distributive laws: p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Identity laws: p ∧ t ≡ p
p ∨ c ≡ p
Negation laws: p ∨ ∼p ≡ t
p ∧ ∼p ≡ c
Double negative law: ∼(∼p) ≡ p
Idempotent laws: p ∧ p ≡ p
p ∨ p ≡ p
Universal bound laws: p ∨ t ≡ t
p ∧ c ≡ c
De Morgan’s laws: ∼(p ∧ q) ≡ ∼p ∨ ∼q
∼(p ∨ q) ≡ ∼p ∧ ∼q
Absorption laws: p ∨ (p ∧ q) ≡ p
p ∧ (p ∨ q) ≡ p
Negations of t and c: ∼t ≡ c
∼c ≡ t
Answer:
a. Sue told her employees the department needed 12% more sales this year than last and they would be contacting at least four new customers each week
Answer:
Hello the options related to your question is missing below are the missing options
A. She administered punishment to Vihaan.
B. She misused the ERG theory with Vihaan.
C. She failed to provide procedural justice.
D. She misused the expectancy theory with Vihaan.
answer : She failed to provide procedural justice. ( C )
Explanation:
Pari has a managerial problem because she failed to provide procedural Justice
Procedural justice is simply treating every employee equally as regards to a certain work procedure at the workplace, Pari did not exhibit that when she excepted Vihaan
Answer: The labour supply tends to be inelastic and the labour demand tends to be elastic.
Explanation: I did some reserch but plz chek other answers first. I hope this helps