Based on the scenario above, the answer is trade deficit.
This is considered to be an economic measure in terms of international trade in
which the imports of the country are exceeded than of the country’s exports.
This is known to be the trade’s negative balance.
Option D is true, the price of the good sold will rise under either policy and there will be a reduction in the level of production
Explanation:
Carbon-free is an effective way, even though the economy puts a monetary price above it and gives a value to the actual cost. Since the pollutant price is still in place, polluters are motivated to reduce pollution and to decide how far the gasses are produced.
In comparison, the restriction or cap on pollution can be published from industry by the cap-and-trade system. This limit is decreased in many cases after the pollution goal is met. If this is the case, the law requires polluters to buy the remaining quota from others with low emissions and generate more than the allotted quota.
Both methodologies will increase the cost of the good generated because it is distortionary. Production should however be decreased because of the control of pollution.
Answer:
the difference between operating incomes under absorption costing and variable costing is $180,000 .
Explanation:
The difference between the two Operating Incomes lies in the amount of Fixed Overheads that has been deferred in Inventory.
So, calculation of the difference will be as follows :
Beginning fixed manufacturing overhead in inventory $230,000
Less Ending fixed manufacturing overhead in inventory ($50,000)
Difference between absorption costing and variable costing $180,000