<h2><em>Explanation:</em></h2><h2><em>Explanation:A stop-and-frisk refers to a brief non-intrusive police stop of a suspect. The Fourth Amendment requires that before stopping the suspect, the police must have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed by the suspect. If the police reasonably suspect that the suspect is armed and dangerous, the police may frisk the suspect, meaning that the police will give a quick pat-down of the suspect's outer clothing. The frisk is also called a Terry Stop, derived from the Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Terry held that a stop-and-frisk must comply with the Fourth Amendment, meaning that the stop-and-frisk cannot be unreasonable. According to the Terry court, a reasonable stop-and-frisk is one "in which a reasonably prudent officer is warranted in the circumstances of a given case in believing that his safety or that of others is endangered, he may make a reasonable search for weapons of the person believed by him to be armed and dangerous." Stop-and-frisks fall under criminal law, as opposed to civil law.</em></h2><h2 />
Answer:B. The IRB will not review this study because it is not research as defined by the federal regulations.
Explanation: A biography is a detailed, in-depth writing about a person's life,his or experiences etc.
IRB(Institutional review board) is an administrative agency established to protect and guarantee the rights of human subjects who are to be engaged or are already engaged in a Research work, Institutional review board seeks to ensure that researches are carried out with utmost respect to the human subjects.
ACCORDING TO IRB RESEARCH IS DEFINED AS A SYSTEMATIC INVESTIGATION, INCLUDING RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT, TESTING, AND EVALUATION, DESIGNED TO DEVELOP OR CONTRIBUTE TO GENERALIZATIONS KNOWLEDGE.
Answer:
A reversible error is an error in trial proceedings that affects a party’s rights so significantly that it is grounds for reversal if the affected party properly objected at trial. Contrast with harmless error.
Explanation:
Answer:
hi if they dont can i be?
Explanation:
Answer:
I believe that the principal's action is a reasonable measure to preserve order in the school.
Explanation:
I believe that the principal's action is a reasonable measure to preserve order in the school, because if he allows anyone to talk as they like then no one would listen to the teacher and the students would think it's okay to do whatever they please. And also the bully's among the students will feel like bulling other students is acceptable and they are miss-using the first amendment is is free speech.