Hello. You did not provide the texts to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
A supreme court decision is only fair if it is in accordance with the laws defended by the federal constitution and if it promotes greater good, peace and social harmony. The supreme court must always act justly and therefore, its decisions must always follow the law in force in the country. If the laws are complied with, the decision is fair, even if it does not seem and it benefits a guilty individual.
That some day I won't be financially stable or able to provide for myself, or even able to support my family, friends, and loved ones financially.
Answer:
A: Otto survived camps; Anne didn’t
Explanation:
This answer makes the most sense.
Answer: 2. They are unrealistic and are therefore unachievable.
Explanation:
Harold Marshall begins this speech by stating that he does have any idealistic promises that will magically fix the city. He states that he is simply a normal citizen and like the rest of the people has heard those promises before from previous mayoral candidates.
Explaining why he does not have such promises for the people, he states that every mayor that has promised them has receded into the annals of history without taking them any closer to the goals they promised. This paints a picture of a man who believes that those goals were unrealistic and by extension unachievable.