Answer:
Statement B
Explanation:
The second statement explains better.
The legislative branch is a very important branch that needs capable hands to work. If it uses part-time lower paid legislators for operation under biennial sessions, it is of low legislative professionalism. The rate of its professionalism is very low and not advisable, it will definitely drag back this arm of government
Answer:
<em><u>b</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
Explanation:
<em><u>(</u></em><em><u>brainleist</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>please</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>tysm</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>and</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>rate</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>excellent</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>and</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>thanks</u></em><em><u>)</u></em>
<em><u>❤</u></em><em><u>☺️</u></em><em><u>☻</u></em><em><u>♨️</u></em><em><u>♨️</u></em><em><u>☻</u></em><em><u>☺️</u></em><em><u>❤</u></em>
Answer:
That sounds like the old Keynesian idea made popular during Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal: Cut taxes and increase government spending to “prime the pump” during a recession; raise taxes and reduce spending to slow down an “overheated” economy. Keynesianism seemed to have been finally laid to rest in the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan argued for a tax cut on supply‐side grounds, and even liberal economists now agree that such fine‐tuning has little effect on the economy.
Explanation:
1. In a free country, money belongs to the people who earn it. The most fundamental reason to cut taxes is an understanding that wealth doesn’t just happen, it has to be produced. And those who produce it have a right to keep it. We may agree to give up a portion of the wealth we create in order to pay for such public goods as national defense and a system of justice. But we don’t give the government an unlimited claim on our money to use as it sees fit.
Answer:
D. It might be hard for voters to really tell which candidates are truly of the "natural aristocracy."
Explanation:
The system of democracy which asserts that the best and brightest citizens (individuals of natural aristocracy) would provided proper representation is criticized because It might be hard for voters to really tell which candidates are truly of the "natural aristocracy." In a population of over 300 million people, it will be hard for the average American voter to identify individuals who are of natural aristocracy, who broke the norm and standout among their peers as such individuals may be confused by those of artificial aristocracy who have the finance, family name and obtained polished education.
The answer is Iraq. The United States declared war on Iraq
and launched the Second Gulf War. Unlike
the previous war, this was very different as Iraqi fighters made the U.S. fight
every inch of the way until they were able to capture Saddam and take control
of the country.