Answer:
Option A ,
Explanation:
The argument is weak. Arguments are always established with multiple facts, and this facts produces different opinions.
Looking at the two statements, there is only one fact talked about in the statement, which is "Sunrise", and it is said that it rises in Nashville every morning, it is not tied to anything else that would raise another fact, so there is only one fact , which cant establish an argument.
So therefore, the argument,(i.e if there is any), is weak because there is only one specific case established.
Cotton gin, separated cotton from seeds, and lessened the need for slave labor in cotton fields. It produced far more cotton than men separating it by hand
Explanation:
Sun oriented shrouds are not really more extraordinary than lunar obscurations – actually, they happen in about equivalent numbers, as a rule around two of each every year. Nonetheless, at any one area on Earth, it is substantially less basic to see a sunlight based overshadowing than a lunar one. Furthermore, the purpose behind this is completely because of math.
Lunar and sun based obscurations happen with about equivalent recurrence. Lunar obscurations are all the more broadly noticeable in light of the fact that Earth projects a lot bigger shadow on the Moon during a lunar shroud than the Moon projects on Earth during a sun based overshadowing. Accordingly, you are bound to see a lunar overshadowing than a sunlight based shroud.