Your answer is negative 2 I took the test and I got it
A fellow BYU courser I see.
Now, I am in the same course as you, but shouldn't there be a "None of the Above" option? (I only finished 1.1 so I don't really know.) I think that is correct.
Based on the picture (I know the picture is almost never drawn to scale but still) I think these line segments aren't parallel.
Also, I think the actual proof involves the Alternate Exterior Angles theorem, and those angles in this case are angles ∠BFC and ∠FCE which aren't listed.
Answer:
4 base ten
Step-by-step explanation:
Rods and units as per data.
{(3,0),(6,1),(9,2)} because
when you plug in the values you get
3-3=3(0) = 0=0
6-3=3(1) = 3=3
9-3=3(2) = 6=6
Step 1 : Divide the numerator by the denominator.
Step 2 : Write the quotient in the front as a whole, remainder in the numerator part and divisor as the denominator.
Therefor you'll have 7 1/7 as a mixed number.