By monopolizing the gold trade and developing the agricultural resources along <span>the Niger River</span>
Answer:
are the wirsti ok n of the a swerve ik s the
Answer:
The Principle of closure.
Explanation:
In psychology, Gestalt therapy is a particular type of therapy that has some principles which it works with during therapy.
One of these principles is the principle of closure.
The principle of closure refers to the tendency that the brains has in which it tends to perceive forms and figures in their complete appearance despite the absence of one or more of their parts, either hidden or totally absent. So our brains tend to "complete" the picture when there are missing parts of it.
In the example, a magician has two people concealed in a long wooden box. <u>One person's head and arms stick out </u>of the front and <u>the other's legs stick out </u>of the back. Then the magician saws down the center and <u>it appears that the magician is sawing someone in half. </u>
In this scenario, <u>our brain "completed" the picture, by seeing the head, arms and legs sticking out of the box, it completed the picture and assumed there was just ONE person</u> in the box. Thus, it perceived one person in their complete appearance despite the absence of the rest of the parts.
Thus, this is an example of Principle of Closure
Answer:
Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.
Explanation:
For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.
Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.
Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.
<span>The most unpredictable presentation aid a speaker could use is a person or an animal.
Presentation aids are things other than the expressions of a speech that are utilized to support the goal of the speaker. Specifically, they can be visual aids, sound aids or other supporting innovation.</span><span /><span>
</span>
