Answer:
$ 2,209,797.96
Explanation:
Given:
Salary = $100,000
Salary investment rate = 13%
Salary increase rate(g) = 5%
number of year = 25
Annual rate of return(i) = 11%
Calculation:
Salary invested = $100,000*13% = $13,000
calculation of present worth
![P=A[\frac{1-(1+g)^n(1+i)^{-n}}{i-g}] \\P=13000[\frac{1-(1+0.05)^{25}(1+0.11)^{-25}}{0.11-0.05}] \\P=13000[\frac{1-(1.05)^{25}(1.11)^{-25}}{0.06}] \\P=13000[\frac{1-(3.386354)(0.073608086)}{0.06}]\\\\P=13000[\frac{1-0.249263}{0.06}]\\\\ P=13000[12.5122827]\\\\\\P= 162,659.675](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%3DA%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2Bg%29%5En%281%2Bi%29%5E%7B-n%7D%7D%7Bi-g%7D%5D%20%5C%5CP%3D13000%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2B0.05%29%5E%7B25%7D%281%2B0.11%29%5E%7B-25%7D%7D%7B0.11-0.05%7D%5D%20%5C%5CP%3D13000%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281.05%29%5E%7B25%7D%281.11%29%5E%7B-25%7D%7D%7B0.06%7D%5D%20%5C%5CP%3D13000%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%283.386354%29%280.073608086%29%7D%7B0.06%7D%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CP%3D13000%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-0.249263%7D%7B0.06%7D%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20P%3D13000%5B12.5122827%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CP%3D%20162%2C659.675)

Output and input levels always tend to an equilibrium point it the long run, meaning they are inelastic in the long run.
Elasticity refers to how much supply and/or demand changes with changes in pricing. The more elastic, the more change there is.
In the short-term, output and and supply can change dramatically, but in the long run things tend back to the middle (equilibrium).
Answer:
b. $50,000 in total
Explanation:
Preference shareholders: The preference shareholders are that shareholders who receive the divided before equity shareholders
The computation of the annual dividend is shown below:
= Number of shares × price per share × rate
= 10,000 shares × $100 × 5%
= $50,000
The annual dividend for preference shareholders will be computed by applying the number of shares, the price per share, and the rate.
Answer:
a) Demonstrating bad timing.
Explanation:
If the firm releases a new technology with the hope of getting a lot of sales, only to have a competitor implement a similar, but more advanced or complete technology shortly after, it is because the firm is not aware enough of the timing of technological advancements.
A firm without bad timing should not have been surpassed in the technology department by a competitor so fast.
This kind of problem has hapenned in real life. for example, when Blackberry launched the 8000 - 9000 series of phones in 2006, only to have Apple launch the much more innovative and groundbreaking Iphone in 2007.