Answer:
c. Equals to 1.5
Explanation:
Options are <em>"a. -lower than b. -higher than c. -equal to
"</em>
Expenditure multiplier = Change in real GDP / Change in spending
Expenditure multiplier = 9/6
Expenditure multiplier = 1.5
Thus, the expenditure multiplier is equal to 1.5
Answer: a). Spain
b). none
c). 2.4
Explanation: a). Absolute advantage occurs when a country produces more of a good than the other country. In this case, Spain produces 50 units of Tractors while, Bolivia produces only 30 units of Tractors. Thus, Since Spain is producing more it has an absolute advantage in Tractors.
b). Both the countries are producing equal units of Cotton. Thus, we can say that none of them has an absolute advantage in cotton production.
c. Opportunity cost is the cost of the lost alternative. When Spain produces Tractors it is sacrificing production of Cotton. So, opportunity cost on 1 unit of Tractor will be,
Thus, 2.4 units of cotton which is given up is the opportunity cost of Spain for producing 1 unit of Tractor.
Answer:
Prosecutors of this case can use the net worth method to determine the extent these executives have been receiving illegal incomes by computing their wealth at the beginning and at the end of the period under investigation.
There will be an increase in the executives wealth, and since this increase cannot be traced to any legal income source, it will become taxable income, with the calculated penalties and fines.
Explanation:
The net worth method specifies that any increase in wealth, which is not traced to non-taxable sources, should be determined as a taxable income for the period under review. Ordinarily, the net worth is the difference between assets and liabilities. Since the executives use the money personally at their convenience, this will increase their personal wealth.
Answer:
An automatic stay against creditors. Once you file, the court automatically issues this stay against any and all debt collection activity.
Dischargeable debts.
Bankruptcy exemptions might allow you to maintain ownership of your property after bankruptcy.
Credit Score.
Answer:
each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss. This is an equal share for each policy and is due to them having the pro rata liability clause. This clause states that a policy is only liable for an equal percentage of the loss if the insurer has other policies from other companies. As in this case.
