Jack is making an assumption while john is making a believable excuse
Answer:
The correct answer is option b.
Explanation:
Here, when the Juice smoothies does not pay Issac, the selling of fruits is an example of mitigation of damages.
Mitigation of damages can be referred as a contract law under which a victim of breach of law can take actions in order to minimize damages. It means to take any reasonable opportunity possible under the given circumstances to minimize or reduce damages. Though taking extreme actions is not required.
Answer:
D. cognitive conflict
Explanation:
Cognitive conflict is a kind of conflict that arises due to someone who tends to provide information different from the one believed by the individual. Basically when one tries to alter the perception an individual has towards any kind of topic and that the belief is tried to be changed by providing extra information, then the individual might get into "cognitive conflict".
As the conflict does not result in any kind of permanent differences but rather just for that particular topic the individual feels to be in different opinion.
Answer:
10% of exam score
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative, foregone (sacrifised) while making a choice.
Example : If a person has option to have an apple or an orange, & choses to have apple. The opportunity cost of having an apple is the sacrifised orange.
Given : A night before mid time exam, spent while watching movies - later lead to fall in exam grade from 70 % to 60%
The opportunity cost of movies watched, is the sacrifised grade of exam, which would have gotten, if the time would have spent in studying. The corresponding grade lost = 70% grade achievable - 60% grade achieved. Hence, the opportunity cost = 10% of exam score.
17 which should equal 215.01 I think- sorry if I’m wrong