France is the right answer .
I hope that's help !
Answer: B - They run their countries in their own best interest.
Explanation: Dictators have absolute control over their country and do not have any checks or balances to make sure they are promoting the welfare of their citizens. So, because of that I have to say it cannot be A or B because dictators don’t have an obligation to server their people and I don’t think it’s D because many dictators don’t establish a successor.
The answer to fill the
blank space is <span>"Dual Processing".</span><span>
</span><span>Complete sentence will be as below:
Dr. Mecina, who is concerned with how vision is processed
consciously and unconsciously, is studying </span>"Dual
Processing".<span>
</span>
<span>Dual processing means that the information is usually
processed on separate conscious and unconscious tracks.</span>
Lets answer this by parts: 1) There is a peasant class in Japanese Bushido, a warrior class called samurais and the noble class. The thing is that the peasants feed the samurai and they protect the peasants and the nobles.The nobles give lands to the samurais as a reward. The base for the Bushido is the Honor. 2) The main elements of the European chivalry are War, Religion and love for women and 3) Because Bushido and Chivalry were aristocratic elites codes the elements that would work well would be a code of conduct, Christianity and a Vision
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
