1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr_godi [17]
4 years ago
10

People who sought “normalization” for individuals with mental illnesses wanted to

History
2 answers:
Lubov Fominskaja [6]4 years ago
5 0

It is of extreme difficulty to acknowledge mental illness since it would mean the individual is part of a stigmatized population.  It's troublesome to admit the emotional, cognitive and behavioral issues because of the reaction of society. The purpose of normalizing mental illness allows the sufferer to feel more comfortable sharing the symptoms without having to worry about the possible stigmatization from friends and family. This would allow prompt treatment and a fast return to wellbeing.

Evgesh-ka [11]4 years ago
3 0

People who sought “normalization” for individuals with mental illnesses wanted to educate the public about the stigma that exists in order to prevent the possible stereotypes, discrimination and prejudice that they suffer in society due to the wrong understanding of the subject.

Unfortunately in our society mental illness is still not fully comprehended because many individuals are unaware of the causes and how it impacts daily life.

You might be interested in
How did the scientific method impact work of scientists in the 16th century?
olasank [31]

Answer: How did the scientific method impact work of scientists in the 16th century?

Explanation: The Scientific Method organized the way scientist conducted experiments. It became safer and less chaotic as the Scientific Method gave them a plan throughout scientist experiments.

6 0
3 years ago
Commodore Matthew perry is best known for taking which action
goldenfox [79]
Moving his fleet into Japanese waters and opening up trade between Japan and the West by threatening to shell the towns--so he is known for "gunboat diplomacy."
5 0
4 years ago
In your opinion, what is the most effective method for changing society—voting, challenges in the courts, nonviolent civil disob
goldenfox [79]

Answer:

Explanation:

If you just talk about the 1960s there really was only one effective way and that was non violent civil disobedience. And the most effective gender were women. Rosa Parks became a leader because "the time was right." By that time, many of the colored "were part of the family." The most effective blows were cast against the middle class and the lower middle class who needed or wanted the colored as servants, as paid companions, as laborers such as gardeners. So when the "uprising" came, the whites were not threatened; they were inconvenienced more than anything. Rosa Parks didn't really disobey her orders nor her place in life. She just bent the rules a bit. She walked to work for one thing. Many of the colored choose that way. Just boycott the buses. It meant that the city of Birmingham, for example, lost a lot of money because they had to run empty buses.

Voting didn't show itself to be as effective as civil disobedience. Yes the colored had the vote. They even had guarantees that came with the vote. In 100 years the vote had really done them no good. There were laws that were created that got them nothing with the vote.

Violence was met with violence. Violence was there for people that had no patience. See anything to do with the Klan. The KKK was not easily intimidated.

So if non violence was so effective, why was it not tried before? I don't know about you, but I can just imagine what would have happened had the slaves tried it before the civil war. They would have had the skin whipped off their backs. After the civil war was no better -- in fact a lot worse. There were many ex-slaves and too few jobs. The "gentry" could pay what they liked for the jobs they needed doing by untrained uneducated labor.

8 0
3 years ago
Feudal lords granted charters to guilds, allowing them to regulate trade. What did guilds do for their lords in return? ​
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

The guilds paid taxes, helped raise armies, and provided other services for their lords. Hope this Helps :)

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which factor was NOT a significant motivation for the Emancipation Proclamation?
igomit [66]

I think the answer is A. I am not 100% positive though.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which diagrams are dichotomous keys?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did Romans create a written code of law?
    8·2 answers
  • When did the German Parliament burn (month & year)? plssssssssss hurry
    6·1 answer
  • Where did james madison grow up in ?
    6·1 answer
  • What does it mean to evaluate and judge?
    14·2 answers
  • New ideas came to the Greek mainland as a result of ?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the economic problems the U.S. faced after WWI?
    15·1 answer
  • How many ethnic Albanian refugees moved from Kosovo to Albania In 1999 A) 105,000 B) 445,000 C) 23,000,000 D) 2,450
    9·2 answers
  • What was the Vietnam War about?<br> O Communism<br> O Land<br> O Money<br> Businesses
    12·1 answer
  • Harvesting
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!