Government contributed to the rise of unrest and dissatisfaction of the American people during the Industrial and Gilded time periods by D. They limited immigration.
<h3>
What is Industrial and Gilded time periods ?</h3>
Industrial and Gilded time periods serves as an era extending around 1870 where there was emergence of industries.
However, Government contributed to the rise of unrest and dissatisfaction of the American people during the Industrial and Gilded time periods by limited immigration.
Learn more about Gilded time from
brainly.com/question/3009202
#SPJ1
Answer:
Women did not have the right to vote
Explanation:
The Magna Carta was created during the reign of King John I.
The Magna Carta is a letter granted by John I of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on June 15, 1215. First drafted by the archbishop of Canterbury, Stephen Langton, to make peace between the English monarch, with ample unpopularity, and a group of rebellious barons, promised the protection of ecclesiastical rights, the protection of barons from illegal imprisonment, access to immediate justice, and limitations on feudal fees to the Crown, which would be implemented through a council of twenty-five barons. None of the sides complied with their commitments and the letter was annulled by Pope Innocent III, which led to the first Barons War. After the death of John I, the government of regency of the young Henry III returned to promulgate the document in 1216 - although stripped of some of its more radical clauses -, in an unsuccessful attempt to obtain political support for its cause. At the end of the war in 1217, the letter was part of the peace treaty agreed upon at Lambeth, where it became known as the "Magna Carta" to distinguish it from the small Forest Charter issued at the same time. Before the lack of funds, Henry III decreed again the letter in 1225 in exchange for a concession of new taxes. His son Edward I repeated the sanction in 1297, this time confirming it as part of the statutory right of England.
The document became part of the English political life and was usually renewed by the monarch on duty, although over time the newly created English Parliament passed new laws, so the letter lost some of its practical significance. At the end of the sixteenth century there was a growing interest in the Magna Carta. The lawyers and historians of the time thought that existed an old English constitution, traced back to the days of the Anglo-Saxons, that it protected the individual freedoms of the English. They argued that the Norman invasion of 1066 had suppressed these rights; according to them, the Magna Carta was a popular attempt to restore them, which made it an essential basis for the contemporary powers of Parliament and legal principles such as habeas corpus. Although this historical account had its flaws, jurists like Edward Coke used the Magna Carta a lot in the early seventeenth century to object to the divine right of kings, proposed by the Stuarts from the throne. Both Jacob I and his son Charles I tried to prohibit the discussion of the Magna Carta, until the English Revolution of the 1640s and the execution of Charles I restricted the issue.
The colonists did not truly want to fight the french and indian war. this is shown through the formation of the albany congress specifically to try and avoid the war. they were willing to join to avoid fighting, which is a *huge* deal. they ended up having to fight the war anyway, against their wishes. the only silver lining for the colonists’ fighting the war is that if they won, they would get to move west onto the newly acquired land afterwards. it was extremely difficult to find new land at the time, which was motivation to move west. this is why it was such a big slap in the face to the colonists when the proclamation of 1763 was passed and they weren’t allowed to move west of the appalachians; the only reason they would’ve wanted to fight the war was for the new land and they weren’t even allowed to move and develop it. also, due to the excessive amount of debt britian racked up to fight the french and indian war (and the seven years’ war; the same war that was happening in europe) they started overtaxing the colonists to make that money back. this lead to the cry of ‘no taxation without representation’, and i’m sure you know how it goes from there. i hope this helps!!
