To buy a certain security using dollar cost averaging, an investor must make regular payments (let's say monthly) of a set dollar amount (let's say $100 per month).
<h3> What is dollar cost averaging?</h3>
The practice of investing a set dollar amount on a regular basis, independent of the share price, is known as dollar cost averaging. It's a terrific method to form a disciplined investing habit, increase your investment efficiency, and possibly reduce your stress—as well as your expenses.
Say you put $100 away each month. Your $100 will buy fewer shares when the market is up, but more shares when the market is down. While compared to what you would have paid if you had purchased all of your shares at once when they were more costly than the average, this technique may eventually lower your average cost per share.
To know more about 'Dollar cost averaging', visit:brainly.com/question/14776694
#SPJ4
Answer:
a) Marginal cost of waiting is greater than the marginal benefit of being served
Explanation:
For an economic perspective, customer leave a fast food restaurant as they find the marginal cost of waiting is higher than the cost of marginal benefit of being served at restaurant.
Marginal cost: In economics, it is a cost that is incurred for an additional unit of benefit received out of certain action or activity.
Marginal benefit: It is a benefit received for an additional unit of cost incurred during the activity taken place.
Therefore, customer have done analysis on the benefit of waiting in a queue for getting served at restaurant, which he found that marginal cost is greater than the marginal benefit of being served.
Answer:
C. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence
Explanation:
Spencer will win the lawsuit and Sally is liable for negligence.
This is because, Sally was the person originally hired to do the roofing job.
She hired other workers to help her with the job, so she's liable to their actions and inactions.
Sally is operating under a working agreement (contract) and has already charged a fee of $10,000 so any punitive damages would be her responsibility.
Spencer was moving around and Glen threw some roofing shingles without any word of warning to people that might be in harm's way. So for Glenn's actions, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Publicity is more credible because it is less biased :)
Answer:
The break-even point in economics, business—and specifically cost accounting—is the point at which total cost and total revenue are equal, i.e. "even". There is no net loss or gain, and one has "broken even", though opportunity costs have been paid and capital has received the risk-adjusted, expected return.
Explanation:
