To offer medical assistance to Third World countries.
The imperialism movement of the 19th century did not show particular concern for the native peoples in the regions they came to control through imperialistic means. There were medical missions and religious missions that accompanied the imperialistic advance into other countries, but those were factors that accompanied the imperialistic advance more than they motivated it.
Also, as a false component of that option, the term "Third World" didn't come into existence until the era of the Cold War. The "Third World" referred to the developing nations that did not align with either of the superpowers, the USA or the USSR. No one was using the term "Third World" in the 19th century.
The wrong person gets elected and could lead to unwanted fights, drama, destruction, people would outrage.
I would go with realism bc the definition of it is: the attitude or practice of accepting a situation as it is and being prepared to deal with it accordingly.
I hope this helps you :) also, if you could choose two answers I would go with intellectualism too
The characterization of mercantilism as a "set of practices" demonstrates the absence of a preconceived plan for the economic policy of European countries that, between the 16th and 18th centuries, disputed slices of American territory to keep them in the condition of colonies. During this period, in Europe, the wealth available in the world was thought of as something that could not be expanded, and therefore the absolutist states strove to secure for themselves as much of this supposedly limited wealth as possible. Gold and silver, circulating in the form of coins or locked in the coffers of kings were understood as their translation, hence the true search fever of the so-called metals
