1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MArishka [77]
3 years ago
10

which idea is shared by both the declaration of independence and the declaration of the rights of man

History
1 answer:
Leni [432]3 years ago
5 0
The main idea that is shared by both the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of the Rights of Man is that humans have certain "unalienable rights" that cannot be stripped or encumbered by any person or government.
You might be interested in
How did the lend-lease act help the allied war effort
Gekata [30.6K]
Lend-lease act was a loophole that allowed American to lend or lease arms to great Britain without requiring cash payment. ... the United States would be able to lend or lease arms to any country considered "vital to the defense of the United States."
7 0
3 years ago
What were the state governments like after the Revolutionary War?
xenn [34]
Many southern states preferred sectionalism rather than Nationalism.
3 0
3 years ago
Why was the George Washington farewell speech written? Whats was the reason for the speech?
Tamiku [17]
To mark a momentous occasion that the first president of the United States is leaving office
6 0
3 years ago
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
4 years ago
Compare John Locke and Voltaire’s work and how they changed the world
Sidana [21]

Answer:

He had a strong influence on Voltaire who called him "le sage Locke". His arguments concerning liberty and the social contract later influenced the written works of Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, and other Founding Fathers of the United States.Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the major events that led the British to defeat
    8·2 answers
  • The english docume t that laid the groundwork for judges in the us to rule based on precedent os known
    12·2 answers
  • The major purpose of the passage of the north american free trade agreement was to:
    10·1 answer
  • Please help ASAP!
    9·2 answers
  • Please Help!
    5·1 answer
  • The immediate cause to the great depression was the
    11·1 answer
  • During the second industrial revolution,which system of production dominated in factories?
    5·2 answers
  • in what year did the German Democratic Republic and the Federal Republic of Germany unify? what kind of government was formed?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the ranaissance lead to advances in sea exploration?
    6·1 answer
  • Someone help!! <br><br> Why do you think America was so successful after entering WW2?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!