1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataly_w [17]
3 years ago
5

There are 560 students in

Mathematics
1 answer:
sashaice [31]3 years ago
8 0
Multiply .35 times 560 to get 196
196 students participate in after school sports
You might be interested in
Which of the following is a polynomial with roots
PtichkaEL [24]
a(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)\\\\x_1=-\sqrt3;\ x_2=\sqrt3;\ x_3=-2;\ a=1\\\\subtitute\\\\(x+\sqrt3)(x-\sqrt3)(x+2)=(x^2-3)(x+2)\\\\=\boxed{x^3+2x^2-3x-6}\to\fbox{B.}
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Software Company earned 2,247,852,199 dollars last year. This year they earned 3,000,962,245 dollars. Which is the best esti
RSB [31]

You know the following information:

1. The amount of money (in dollars) earned last year was:

2,247,852,199

2. The amount of money (in dollars) earned this year, is:

3,000,962,245

Then, to estimate the sum (the total amount of money the Software Company earned in those two years, you can round the numbers to the nearest billion.

Having:

2,247,852,199

You need to look at the digit located in the Hundred millions place. Notice that this is:

2

Then, since:

2

You need can't round up. Then:

2,247,852,199\approx2,000,000,000

Now, having:

3,000,962,245

You can identify that the digit in the Hundred millions place is

0

Therefore:

3,000,962,245\approx3,000,000,000

Now you can add the numbers rounded:

2,000,000,000+3,000,000,000=5,000,000,000

Hence, the answer is: Option B.

5 0
1 year ago
Please help me and are u supposed to divide 1056 by 24
insens350 [35]

1056/24

=44

Hope this helps!

Thanks!

-Charlie

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP I WILL PICK BRAINLIEST
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

A more complex question has rarely been asked.

Principia Mathematica took nearly a thousand pages to prove that 1+1=2. It does meander a bit, but had they wanted to prove 1+1=2 alone, it could have done so in 500 pages.

Mathematically speaking, the definition of 1 is:

There exists a number such that when multiplied upon an element of a specified set, yields the element of the specified set.

It is also defined as:

1.0000000000000000000000…

.9999999999999999999999999…

as the set of all singletons.

a singleton is a set with exactly 1 element.

These 4 definitions work in tandem with one another.

For example:

1=1

Divide both sides by 3.

1/3=1/3

Rewrite.

1/3=.33333333333333333...

Multiply both sides by 3.

1=.9999999999999999999...

Similarly:

If    =.9999999999999999999...

10=9.99999999999999999...

10=9+.99999999999999...

10=9+

Simplify by subtracting x from both sides.

9=9

=1

.99999999999999999999...=1

As the set of all singletons, 1 is also THE element that represents the set of all single entities.

That is to say: if you have 7 erasers. What you really have is a set of 7 single entities. The definition of 7 becomes: 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1; and not as is commonly believed as: 6 + 1.

There is an argument for 7 to be defined as 6 + 1, but this argument is a corollary of the Peano Axioms which in turn argues that there exists a set with absolutely nothing in it {} and a set with exactly something in it {x}. More on this later.

The Principia Mathematica uses Peano's (from the Peano Axioms mentioned earlier) work and notation to expertly slice through the many nuances pertaining to this question.

This is something we will not do; but hopefully, we will also be able to effectively demonstrate why 1 + 1 = 2 in less than 1000 pages.

We will assume these basic principles of number theory:

There exists a number such that when multiplied to an element of a specific set, yields that element of the specific set.

There exists a number such that when added to an element of a specific set, yields that element of the specific set.

If we again assume to have only two sets, a set that is empty: {} containing no elements, and a set that is not empty {x} containing an element. We realize that Consequently, we went from nothing {}, to something {x}. This means that {x} is the successor to {}, as the next step up from nothing, is something.

As such we now have two elements:

Nothing, {}, and something that comes after {}, this something is called the successor, and it is the Successor of nothing.

in written notation we have:

{} and { the Successor of nothing }

Rewritten:

{0, the thing that comes after 0}

Further reworded:

{0, Successor (0) }

Reduced further:

0,(0)

Where S(0) stands in place of ‘the successor’. Further, we know there are an infinite number of possible Natural numbers, and we get:

{0, Successor of 0, the successor of the successor of 0, the successor of the successor of the successor of 0,…}

Further reduced:

0,(0),((0)),(((0))),((((0)))),(((((0)))),…

Further explained:

We know that we had nothing, and added something to it, and got something:

Nothing + Something = Successor of nothing.

0+__=(0)

We also know that there is nothing closer to 0, than the thing that comes after 0.

0+(0)=(0)

This implies that S(0) is the smallest increment possible from natural number to next natural number.

As a consequence, we now have two discovered entities: Something, and Nothing.

Let’s give them names.

We have decided that

Nothing = 0 .

0 = Nothing.

S(0) is the something that comes after nothing.

We define a new symbol: 1, to be: 1 = S(0)

This is to say that 1 IS the symbol that succeeds 0;

We could have drawn any shape to define the number that succeeds 0; we chose to draw a 1.

0+(0)=(0)

0+1=(0)

0+1=1

0,1,((0)),(((0))),((((0)))),(((((0)))),…

We now have definitions for 0, and 1. What about a definition for the thing that comes after one? The successor of 1?

As we know S(0) is the smallest increment available, and we are interested in finding S(0)’s successor we investigate:

The successor to the successor of Nothing:

0+(0)=1;1+(0)=(1)

This reads:

The successor of the successor of nothing IS the successor of one

And now… we need a new symbol.

We define the

(1)=2

The successor of 1 IS 2.

Thus:

0+(0)=1;1+(0)=(1)=2

Simplify:

0+1=1;1+1=(1);(1)=2.

Further:

0+1=1;1+1=2;2=2.

1 has many different properties; but all of the properties and their resulting definitions have little to do with why 1 + 1 = 2. And that 1 + 1 = 2 is a byproduct of properties inherent to Natural numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How to solve for each angle measure.
Feliz [49]
Have you considered applying the Law of Cosines?

For angle B:      b^2 = a^2 + c^2 - 2ac*cos B

a, b and c are all known, leaving cos B as the only unknown.  Find cos B, and then find angle B itself.  From the diagram we know that angles A, B and C are all acute.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The perimeter of a rectangle is 16 feet. What are the possible dimensions of the rectangle, using only whole numbers of the feet
    11·1 answer
  • The slope intercept form of the equation of a line that passes through point (-2, -13) is y = 5x - 3. What is the point slope fo
    8·1 answer
  • A line has a slope of -2/3 and a y-intercept of (0, 3). What is the value of y when x = 4?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the ordered pair for point b on the graph (-1,4) (4,-1) (5,1) (1,5)
    9·1 answer
  • Find all factors of13
    12·2 answers
  • A point, beginning at (0,0), undergoes the following composition of translation. Write an ordered pair for the points final posi
    8·1 answer
  • Create a question that could be answered by using all of the data
    15·1 answer
  • If the interest on $2000 for 2 years is $320, then what is the interest rate?
    13·1 answer
  • The number 0.4 can be written as 4/10 so it’s a rational number, true or false
    8·2 answers
  • Adwoa received a commission of 20% on a bread she sold. in one week, Adwoa's commission was Gh¢540.00.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!