Answer:
$270
Step-by-step explanation:
You can do this:
$360*0.75
The answer is True.
On differentiating using product rule,
![\mathsf {\frac{d}{dx}[xe^{x}] = x(e^{x})+e^{x}(1)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathsf%20%7B%5Cfrac%7Bd%7D%7Bdx%7D%5Bxe%5E%7Bx%7D%5D%20%3D%20x%28e%5E%7Bx%7D%29%2Be%5E%7Bx%7D%281%29%7D)
![\mathsf {\frac{d}{dx}[xe^{x}] = e^{x}(x + 1)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathsf%20%7B%5Cfrac%7Bd%7D%7Bdx%7D%5Bxe%5E%7Bx%7D%5D%20%3D%20e%5E%7Bx%7D%28x%20%2B%201%29%7D)
The general form of product rule :

Answer:
a



b
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The probabilities are
Supplier chosen A B C
Probability P(a) = 0.20 P(b) = 0.25 P(c) = 0.15
D E
P(d) = 0.30 P(e) = 0.10
Generally the new probability of companies A being chosen as the sole supplier this year given that supplier E goes out of business is mathematically represented as below according to Bayes theorem


=> 
=> 
Generally the new probability of companies B being chosen as the sole supplier this year given that supplier E goes out of business is mathematically represented as below according to Bayes theorem


=> 
=> 
Generally the new probability of companies C being chosen as the sole supplier this year given that supplier E goes out of business is mathematically represented as below according to Bayes theorem


=> 
=> 
Generally the new probability of companies D being chosen as the sole supplier this year given that supplier E goes out of business is mathematically represented as below according to Bayes theorem


=> 
=> 
Generally the probability that B, D , E are not chosen this year is mathematically represented as
![P(N) = 1 - [P(e) +P(b) + P(d) ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28N%29%20%3D%20%201%20-%20%5BP%28e%29%20%2BP%28b%29%20%2B%20P%28d%29%20%5D)
=> ![P(N) = 1 - [0.10 +0.25 +0.30 ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28N%29%20%3D%20%201%20-%20%5B0.10%20%2B0.25%20%20%2B0.30%20%5D)
=> 
Generally the probability that A is chosen given that E , D , B are rejected this year is mathematically represented as

=>
=>
-k + 0.03 + 1.01k = -2.45 - 1.81k
Multiplying through by 100, we have
-100k + 3 + 101k = -245 - 181k
Answer:
The correct answer is C
Step-by-step explanation:
Isabel is incorrect because the point of intersection between line B and parabola A that can be determined is the y-intercept of the equations
Hope this helps!