The flaw that is shown in the local newspaper article on the herbal supplement has the flaw of B. Correlational data used to suggest causation.
<h3>Why does correlation not equate to causation?</h3>
Correlation is not the same as causation and this means that just because two variables are occurring at the same time does not mean that one variable is causing the other. There could be extenuating circumstances involved.
In this case, there is no evidence that the herbal supplement is the reason why those who take it have less fatigue. There might be other factors such as those people take generally healthy food in general.
Find out more on correlation and causation at brainly.com/question/12479370
#SPJ1
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>The distribution of a sample mean tends to be skewed to the right or left. </em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>The sampling distribution</em><em> is described as one of the probability distribution related to a statistic discovered via an entirely large number of various samples that are being drawn from a particular population. However, the "sampling distribution" of a particular population refers to the distribution of distinct frequencies related to a range of various outcomes that can occur towards the statistics of a given population. </em>
Answer: Multilateral or international agreement.
Explanation:
This agreement is an agreement between two, three, or more entities supported by international legal norms. This type of contract is most often concluded between states and is a legal act that must be respected. This contract originated in Vienna in 1969, and the contract came into practice 11 years later. The convention is currently accepted and signed by about 116 countries around the world.
Scientists were interested in testing a new technique to prevent slipping on ice one group simply wore boots, while the other group wore socks over their boots.
Option: C
Explanation:
Scientist always try to bring out a new technique to solve out some problems like to prevent or avoid slipping on ice scientist followed a method that is they divide the whole group into two sub parts one having simple boots while other group having socks over boots.
In this way scientist want to watch and experiment the effect of not wearing boots and having boots with socks that affect the slipping over ice. If both the groups wore same shoes then the experiment would not work out properly. Two different techniques must be followed by the scientist.
Answer:
Im pretty sure its King David.
Explanation: