Problem 1)
AC is only perpendicular to EF if angle ADE is 90 degrees
(angle ADE) + (angle DAE) + (angle AED) = 180
(angle ADE) + (44) + (48) = 180
(angle ADE) + 92 = 180
(angle ADE) + 92 - 92 = 180 - 92
angle ADE = 88
Since angle ADE is actually 88 degrees, we do NOT have a right angle so we do NOT have a right triangle
Triangle AED is acute (all 3 angles are less than 90 degrees)
So because angle ADE is NOT 90 degrees, this means
AC is NOT perpendicular to EF-------------------------------------------------------------
Problem 2)
a)
The center is (2,-3) The center is (h,k) and we can see that h = 2 and k = -3. It might help to write (x-2)^2+(y+3)^2 = 9 into (x-2)^2+(y-(-3))^2 = 3^3 then compare it to (x-h)^2 + (y-k)^2 = r^2
---------------------
b)
The radius is 3 and the diameter is 6From part a), we have (x-2)^2+(y-(-3))^2 = 3^3 matching (x-h)^2 + (y-k)^2 = r^2
where
h = 2
k = -3
r = 3
so, radius = r = 3
diameter = d = 2*r = 2*3 = 6
---------------------
c)
The graph is shown in the image attachment. It is a circle with center point C = (2,-3) and radius r = 3.
Some points on the circle are
A = (2, 0)
B = (5, -3)
D = (2, -6)
E = (-1, -3)
Note how the distance from the center C to some point on the circle, say point B, is 3 units. In other words segment BC = 3.
Your answer would be 0.05 per ounce
The height of the telephone tower is 120 feet.
The first step to solve this problem is to figure out what fraction of the height of the actual object the shadow is. We can find this by dividing the length of the shadow by the actual height.
4/6 = 2/3, meaning that the shadow is 2/3 of the actual height
Since we know that the shadow is 2/3 of the height, we can multiply by the reciprocal, 3/2, to find the actual height if we know the length of the shadow.
80 · 3/2 = 120, so the height of the telephone tower is 120 feet.
(a)

Substitute <em>x</em> = 3 tan(<em>t</em> ) and d<em>x</em> = 3 sec²(<em>t </em>) d<em>t</em> :


(b) The series

converges by comparison to the convergent <em>p</em>-series,

(c) The series

converges absolutely, since

That is, ∑ (-1)ⁿ (<em>n</em> ² + 9)/<em>e</em>ⁿ converges absolutely because ∑ |(-1)ⁿ (<em>n</em> ² + 9)/<em>e</em>ⁿ| = ∑ (<em>n</em> ² + 9)/<em>e</em>ⁿ in turn converges by comparison to a geometric series.