As I remember, The Articles of Union a.gave Oliver Cromwell the role of Lord Protector
Answer:
Judaism
Explanation:
Judaism was divided into three strands: orthodox, reformist and conservative.
Orthodox Jews are those who strictly and strictly follow all precepts stipulated by Jewish law. These precepts explore and impose rules on food, family purity and Sabbath rest. In addition, it imposes a strong respect for gender roles, clothing and other things. They are the most radical and intense aspect of Judaism
.
For Orthodox Jews, the Torah was a book written by God and should be followed literally, with no room for interpretation and modification. This differs from the Reform Jews, who are a strand that believes that the teachings and laws expressed in the Torah should be modified according to the advancement of society. Although reformist Jews obey the concepts of diets and keeping the Sabbath, they believe that some Torah guidelines do not fit in today's society, some of these guidelines, for example, require reform of the role and rights of Jewish women.
The third strand is formed by conservative Jews. This aspect presents itself as a middle ground between orthodox Jews and reformist Jews. In this case, the members of this strand believe that some guidelines of the Torah can be adapted to the present, but they believe that there are sacred precepts and that they cannot, jamasi, be modified.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
they lost the war and were forced to move
There are many reasons but here's two
1. The 'war' and invasion etc was fought in the West so the province that you are going to have to raise troops and revenue from to fight the war is the same one where all the fighting takes place.
Meanwhile the 'East' had Anatolia as a heartland for revenue and recruits that was untouched .
<span>2. There is alot of evidence that it wasn't simply 'barbarian' invasion but also a large element of rebellion against central authority by local forces. These are the people who are supposed to supply your troops and revenue.</span>
Generally speaking, it was that the flood "B. increased trust in government relief agencies" that was not an effect of the flood of 1927 on the state of Arkansas, since there was widespread criticism of the response.