Answer: the x-intercept is (-10,0), the y-intercept is (0,45/2)
Explanation:
First, we need to determine the function describing the line.
From the table, it is obvious that the y values increase by 9 every increase of 4 of the x values. So, the slope is 9/4 and the function looks like this:
with the y-intercept (or bias) b still unknown. This can be determined by using one of the point from the table, like so:
The above function form makes it easy to read off the y-intercept, which is (0,45/2) or (0,22.5). The x-intercept is obtained by setting y = 0 and solving for x:
The x-intercept is (-10,0)
Answer: The correct answer is option C: Both events are equally likely to occur
Step-by-step explanation: For the first experiment, Corrine has a six-sided die, which means there is a total of six possible outcomes altogether. In her experiment, Corrine rolls a number greater than three. The number of events that satisfies this condition in her experiment are the numbers four, five and six (that is, 3 events). Hence the probability can be calculated as follows;
P(>3) = Number of required outcomes/Number of possible outcomes
P(>3) = 3/6
P(>3) = 1/2 or 0.5
Therefore the probability of rolling a number greater than three is 0.5 or 50%.
For the second experiment, Pablo notes heads on the first flip of a coin and then tails on the second flip. for a coin there are two outcomes in total, so the probability of the coin landing on a head is equal to the probability of the coin landing on a tail. Hence the probability can be calculated as follows;
P(Head) = Number of required outcomes/Number of all possible outcomes
P(Head) = 1/2
P(Head) = 0.5
Therefore the probability of landing on a head is 0.5 or 50%. (Note that the probability of landing on a tail is equally 0.5 or 50%)
From these results we can conclude that in both experiments , both events are equally likely to occur.
We start by calculating the assessed value, that is 41% of the price.
The price is $92,000.
Then, the assessed value is:
The property tax rate is $39.50 per $1000 of assessed value, so we can express this rate as:
We then can multiply this rate by the assessed value to calculate the total property tax:
NOTE: we could have also multiplied 39.50 by 37.72. The value 37.72 is the thousands of dollars of assessed value. We would have obtained the same result: 39.50*37.72=1489.94.
Answer: the property tax is $1,489.94.
Answer: C. No solution. ( top shaded. Middle not. Bottom shaded.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given inequalities
y< -1/3x+5 and
y> -1/3x-1.
If we draw graph for y< -1/3x+5 equation, it would be a dotted line and we would shade down the dotted line because we have less than < symbol there.
Now, if we draw graph for second inequality y> -1/3x-1, it would also be a dotted line and we would shade up of dotted line because we have greater than > symbol there.
Now, we can see that slopes of both dotted lines are same that is -1/3.
So, there would not be any common shaded region.
Therefore, there would not by any solution of the system of inequalities.
And correct option is C option.
C. No solution. ( top shaded. Middle not. Bottom shaded.
If u subtract 6-9 u would get a -3 because the 9 is bigger than the 6 so thats how you get a -3.
