Answer:It is really not the laissez faire doctrine as such, but the art of persuasion. Philosophical anarchism, or opposition to any governmental power or activity provided alternatives to laissez faire as lying along a straight line measuring d "economic freedom"
Explanation:
Answer:
c. Just because Dasha satisfied two requirements of being a sage doesnât necessarily mean that she satisfies all the requirements of being a sage.
Explanation:
This can be explained by perspective of Western Logic.
Let : Sages = S ; Wise & Inspiring = P
'All sages provide wisdom & inspiration' implies 'All S are P'
But 'All S are P' doesn't necessarily imply 'All P are S'
So : 'All saints are wise & inspiring people' doesn't necessarily imply 'All wise & inspiring people are saints'
Therefore : Dasha, being a wise & inspiring person doesn't garauntee that she is a saint. Hence, wisdom & inspiration satisfy only two requirements of being a sage doesn't necessarily mean that she satisfies all the requirements of being a sage.
Answer:
False (B)
Explanation:
Traffic signs, signs and official landlines need to be adhered to, and these matters take precedence over the traffic regulations that contradict them, and traffic lights take precedence over signs regulating road priority.
The one that describes an important social change during the Bronze age is :
The division of labor allowed people to specialize in different trades
With this division , many citizens could choose the work that is suitable for their skills/gift
hope this helps
Answer:
Explanation:
Although both of them are important theories in ethics, consequentialism has it focus on the outcome of actions, that is, judging the morals of the consequences of actions engaged in by anyone, while deontological theory has it focus centered on how moral rule precedes certain action in which action is judged and not the outcome of such action.
