<span> John Aycliffe was the person who had arrived
Hope this helps ^-^
Enjoy</span>
Answer:
The Crucible, Arthur Miller’s 1953 realist play, is based on the historical events of the 1692 Salem witch hunts. Although partially fictionalised, it depicts the very real consequences of false accusations based on blind religious faith, as Miller displays the dangers of such baseless rumours. However, the play was written during another type of witch hunt: McCarthyism in 1950s America. This was a political movement in which Senator Joseph McCarthy attempted to control the spread of Communism by placing any Communist sympathisers on a blacklist. This resulted in a widespread fear of Communist influences, and a political hunt similar to the Salem witch trials began, as civilians attempted to escape their own charges by accusing other innocent individuals of treason. Thus, given the historical context of the time, Miller uses The Crucible as an allegorical warning for the audience against the dangers of McCarthyism in 1950s America.
These concepts will be fully unpacked later, but it is important to keep these key notions of hysteria, accusation and blind faith in mind as you study the text. These are the fundamental ideas that the play is based upon, and also the elements which make The Crucible hugely relevant in our society today. One could even say that the development of technology has made it easier for false allegations and social rumours to spread - leading to drastic consequences specific to the 21st century, such as the leaking of critical government information and cyberbullying. Not to mention, the anonymity of technology has enabled individuals to start modern-day witch hunts as a nameless, faceless user behind the comfort and security of their screens!
Explanation:
Miller introduces the play with the witch Abigail Williams, whose witchcraft hysteria is due to her carnal lust for Proctor. Abigail's desire to possess Proctor motivates her, driving her to drink blood and cast a spell on Elizabeth. The evil present in Abigail can only be understood in terms of human depravity.
Answer: D. to provide
Divest means to get rid of.
A. to take away (take away and get rid of are the same thing.)
B. to control (has nothing to do with control, isn't the opposite of to get rid of)
C. to devise (to plan isn't the opposite to get rid of)
D. to provide (to provide is the opposite of to get rid off)
Answer: D. to provide
Answer: an invasion of a castle.
Explanation: "They enter my castle wall!"
I hope this helps :)
