Answer:
The empire would have collapse,This because the invasion what timed to the period when(Tahuantinsuyo) Inca empire was the mist of succession between two prince brothers:princes Huáscar and Atahualpa.The latter won the civil war that ensued.
Therefore, the empire was already weakened by this(civil war) before the Spaniard arrival led by Francisco Pizarro and his men,
Another contributing factor was the wide expansion of the empire with the extended regions possessing distinctive cultures, and ruled by local leaders, but supervised by the Inca officials. However,this expanded areas were not keen in participating in the imperial projects.Therefore the administration of these area by the inca was ineffective,
Thus if the Spaniards had not invaded,there will be a eventual collapse because, the extensive terrain with reluctance in empire projects, crude means of transportation, (combined with the disunity between the prince brothers)were hindering effective administration,which would lead to eventual collapse off the empire.
Explanation:
Answer:
The attitude of not practicing what you preach as displayed by Pastors
Explanation:
When a pastor mounts a pulpit to preach the need or to pay evil for evil, it creates a cognitive feeling of the essence of doing good. But when the same preacher is seen living contrary to what he preached, for example fighting because of money, it invariably redefine ones notion, attitude, belief and behaviour, most especially after making a resolve not to fight again.
This consistency theory is purportedly postulated by Karman's theory of notion.
Answer:
Jury duty: Allows participation in the Legal System.
Civil participation: Boosts the growth of local community's.
Following Local and National laws: Helps maintain social order.
Hope i helped! please mark me brainiest I need it.
Answer:
external cause
Explanation:
Elaina is showing a common phenomenon in social psychology:
the attribution to external causes, which means that she assigns the cause of a happening to situations that are external to her, and rather than assessing her performance in terms of her inner characteristics.
She could have also <em>expressed how her feelings and state of mind at that time played a part, but instead, she is making external attributions, like "judges being unfair by giving her all harder words".</em>
The attribution theory in social psychology see how people try to point out to more causes that are in the surroundings or external, and often this influences their motivations and behaviour.
If people make inferences why others behave in a certain way and they refer to the outside then, we speak of external causes.
Social perception and self-perception can have internal, external causes and often we are advised to seek motivations in any of these ways.
is there an attachment to look at? not enough info here but ill be glad to help if u can add more:(
