1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anit [1.1K]
3 years ago
8

What was the biggest weakness of the articles of confederation?

History
2 answers:
VLD [36.1K]3 years ago
7 0
The national government could not force the states to obey its laws
cluponka [151]3 years ago
5 0
The National Government could not force the states to obey it's laws.
You might be interested in
7. What were some of the limitations of the new deal?
denis-greek [22]

Answer:

The New Deal fell short of many peoples expectations. For example, the Fair Labor Standards Act covered fewer than a quarter of all unemployed workers, the minimum wage was at 25 cents, which was lower than the average wage, and it wasn't beneficial to women and minorities.

6 0
3 years ago
In spite of its seeming insignificance in a time of major empires, what major part did Austria play in stabilizing Europe?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

Austria Halted Turkish Advances into Europe by driving them back out into the Balkans.

Explanation:

I done a little research so hope it helps!

7 0
3 years ago
Complete the passage with the correct words or phrases
Kisachek [45]

Answer:

1.utopianism   2.education

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the history of the voter ID law debate?
liubo4ka [24]
In voter id law debate has been talked about in many places in 1986 the first debate was held and they talked about why or how people were making different ids in different states
4 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast Hobbes’ and Locke’s views of human nature and the role government should play
svet-max [94.6K]

Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another.  This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.

John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience.  Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.

Further explanation:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em>  in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • "in 1996, president bill clinton's reelection campaign sought to reach soccer moms—"busy suburban women devoted to their jobs an
    6·2 answers
  • What was a result of the arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union during president Eisenhower’s term?
    9·2 answers
  • What were the effects of the Tet Offensive at home and in Vietnam?
    6·2 answers
  • Explain the differences between the federalist and anky-federalist
    8·1 answer
  • What German monk believed that Christians had to live by faith alone and depend on the mercy of God?
    5·2 answers
  • "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain un
    11·2 answers
  • Why was the building of the Brooklyn bridge of importance to New Yorkers
    8·1 answer
  • Who was the publisher of Galveston News who owned first telephone in Texas​
    9·1 answer
  • What is the special features of fathepur sikri?​
    14·1 answer
  • How did italy and germany became United?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!