The correct answer is <em><u>option 3. The Constitution of the United States limit the power of the President as Commander in Chief by granting the power to declare war to the Congress.</u></em> As a part of its check and balance system, the Constitution, in its Article 1. Section 8, declares that t is the Congress who holds the power to declare war to another nation. The President, as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, has the power of directing the army, once the declaration of war has been emitted by the Congress. This is done to put boundaries to the power of the President, and to have a general agreement of the government before declaring war.
In many ways, the two notions are at odds. Or, at least, mild conflict.
Free Market Capitalism is an economic system understands that some will succeed and others will not. People will be rewarded for their ingenuity and market acumen and bad ideas will be disregarded and rejected.
American Democracy (Democratic-Republic) is defined by citizens banding together to solve common problems, while reserving the right of private property and concepts of liberty.
So, as free market capitalism has expanded in periods of history, Democracy has often taken a hit. As collective Democratic ideals have expanded, free market ideals have declined.
The New Deal is common understood as a retraction of the free market and the expansion of American collective Democracy. We are currently in a period of struggle between free market capitalism and strong collective Democracy. Only time will tell which concept will prevail.
Type of money system designed by Jefferson is a Coin
From the options, I find two that are potentially good, as the other ones actually include small inconsistencies which make them false: (e.g. the islands surrouding Ithaka lie not only to south and east
Dulichium, Same, and Zacynthus are all visible to Ithaca
Odysseus holds his home very close to his heart.
Of these two the more relevant is the following, and I think it's also the correct option:
Odysseus holds his home very close to his heart.
it provides an argument why he things that it's a good place to grow up
Personality theorists who adopt a teleological approach generally believe that people's behavior is a function of <u>people's expectations of future events.</u>
<u />
A subset of behaviorism from a psychological perspective is called teleological behaviorism. It maintains that psychological insights are best derived by the objective observation of externally observable human activities, in accord with the core principles of its branch. Immanuel Kant is the advocate of this strategy.
It is said that rather than focusing on their origins, many events are best understood and explained in terms of their goals. Its supporters in psychology contend that mental processes are purposeful, or oriented toward a specific objective.
To know more about Personality here
brainly.com/question/20164923
#SPJ4
