Population net income consists of the difference between labor income and expenditure. If the government adopts a contractionary fiscal policy, that is, increases taxes, the net income of the population will decrease, since part of the income will be directed to the payment of taxes. For the Fed to compensate for this decline in income, an expansionary monetary policy will have to be adopted, ie the Fed must act to stimulate the population's income. The increase in money supply has the effect of warming the economy in the form of higher demand and higher wages. This is the form of compensation between two different policies, one contractionist and one expansionist.
Explanation: the fair value of the shares given plus the fair value of the contingent consideration is the total amount paid by the buyer which is (20000 shares * $10 price per share) = $200000+$10000= $210000.
The gain of the transaction is registered as the net fair value of the acquiree that is $350000-$70000= $280000 less the sum paid by the Acquirer that is $280000-$210000= $70000.
The $15000 in direct acquisition costs are registered as period expenses and not relevant for the calculation of the gain of the transaction.
<span>If supply for a product is high but demand is low, the one that most likely needs to happen to achieve equilibrium is: B. The price of the product must go down.
High supply of product will create an abundance in the market. By lowering the price of the product, it will attract more consumers for that product (icnreasing its demand) and will eventually lower the product abundance and bring the curve into equilibrium</span>
The correct answer is A) A market share of over 50% from the combined companies
Explanation:
The Clayton Act of 1914 regulates acquisitions and mergers in the United States. This is the legal source that the Justice Deparment would use to approve or disapprove the merger described in the question. It explicitly forbids mergers that result in over 50% of market share, because it consideres a higher percentage than that (a market share from 50% to 99%) to configurate a monopoly.
The merger in the question would result in a 70% market share, way higher than the legal limit, hence it would be denied by the DOJ.
