The answer would be B. The more slaves that survive, the more profit that the slave traders made. In this case, most slave traders were urgently wanting large amounts of profit. So, the traders would do as much as it took to keep as many as they could alive throughout the voyage.
When slaves die, the trader loses profit.
The history of the American Revolution does not prove that owning small firearms is a means for citizens to defend themselves.
<h3 /><h3>Does the American Revolution support the Second Amendment?</h3>
Proponents of the Second Amendment had the notion that if civilians had small firearms, they would be able to defend themselves against tyrannical governments.
Yet this was not the case in the American Revolution because the people could not rely on small firearms to defend themselves against the British.
They had to rely on heavy artillery and arms which was what the British had as well.
Find out more on the Second Amendment at brainly.com/question/1750552.
#SPJ1
Answer:
Decreased the power of the Boyars by introducing a merit-based system and allowed lower class people a chance. He also sent boyars children away to Europe to be educated).
Explanation:
The Coercive acts or intorable acts were passed by the Britishers as a way to stop people from plotting against the Crown. Option B is correct.
<h3>What are Coercive acts?</h3>
The Intolerable Acts or Coercive Acts of 1774 had been a sequence of punitive legal guidelines exceeded with the aid of using the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party.
The legal guidelines aimed to punish Massachusetts colonists for his or her defiance withinside the Tea Party protest of the Tea Act, a tax degree enacted with the aid of using Parliament in May 1773.
Thus, The Coercive acts or intorable acts were passed by the Britishers as a way to stop people from plotting against the Crown. Option B is correct.
learn more about Intolerable Acts:
brainly.com/question/5956228
#SPJ1
