<span>Show the ambiguity and inherent questions in human beings and their morality. Because the works are so ambiguous, they make the reader question their own morality, as well as the nature of morality in general. He played off the idea of people's base desires and of doing the right thing.</span>
Answer:
While the lawyer was more inclined towards life imprisonment for a convict, the young banker did not approve of either life imprisonment or capital punishment. They also have a heated argument regarding both the forms of punishment. Suspense picks up when the banker challenges the young lawyer to spend fifteen years in solitary confinement and the lawyer accepts it in lieu of money worth two millions.
Explanation:
Answer:
Weaver is referring to a book she has never read. Instead, she read the cliff notes. Weaver is serious when she says the book's synopsis moved her. The dramatic irony is that she is unaware of her own absurdity. Weaver states at the conclusion of the essay, "I enjoyed this book so much, I'm going to read all of Steinbeck's Cliffs Notes." But first I'm going to the library to check out the original version of Mice and Men with John Malkovich and Gary Sinise," Weaver concludes.
The author of this satirical post makes us laugh at something extremely prevalent in our high schools and universities. We can clearly understand the author's sense of humor and motivation for creating this piece.
The author wanted the reader to giggle at the humor of falling in love with a book based on cliff notes and not reading it. No one can really appreciate a literary work's tone and details without investigating it thoroughly. Reading summaries isn't enough. This is satirized in the article.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
D.1 i need a least 20 characters to answer
Usually I put it in paragraph 4, the paragraph BEFORE your conclusion. Someone pls correct me if I’m wrong.
1. Intro
2. Body paragraph 1
3. Body paragraph 2
4. Counter-claim/rebuttal
5. Conclusion