James Madison's theory treats freedom of expression as an intrinsic feature of democracy. In this way you should not use the pretext of "defense of democracy" to silence a man because you disagree with him, even if he is a fascist.
We can cite as evidence the power relationship between the king or president and the people. Freedom of expression does not exist for the tyrant to be silenced, but for him to speak and we can answer him.
Missionaries, businessmen, military in that order.
The presidential system selects a head of government independently of the legislature, while in contrast, the head of government in a parliamentary system answers directly to the legislature. Presidential systems necessarily operate under the regulations of separation of powers, while parliamentary methods do not.
<h3>What is the presidential state of government give an example?</h3>
A presidential system is a method of government where a head of government is also head of state and shows an executive branch that is different from the legislative branch. The United States, for instance, has a presidential system.
<h3>What is the difference of parliamentary and presidential?</h3>
In a parliamentary form of government, the powers are divided between the little head and the real head of the state. In a presidential form of government on the other hand the forces are concentrated in the hands of the single executive or the President of the nation.
To learn more about presidential system, refer
brainly.com/question/15453662
#SPJ9
Answer:
An uprising in several sepoy companies of the Bengal army was sparked by the issue of new gunpowder cartridges for the Enfield rifle in February 1857. Loading the Enfield often required tearing open the greased cartridge with one's teeth, and many sepoys believed that the cartridges were greased with cow and pig fat.
