Answer:
Employees frequently complain about the inconsistent assistance they receive from the HR department due to its large size.
Explanation:
Having a specialized, embedded HR unit is beneficial to each, specific unit, as HR would cater to every department and its special needs. On the contrary, centralized HR tends to give inconsistent help, as they always assign a different person or team when a problem arises.
So, if the employees complained that they cannot receive adequate help from the centralized HR, it would be wise to do what Roberta suggested.
Answer:
A) Consider sending a printed message.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the most sensible step to get an important response from a supplier after the supplier has not responded would be to send a printed message.
This option would be ideal among the other alternatives above, as it demonstrates that you understand that the supplier may not have seen or been aware of your question, even if numerous e-mails have already been sent, and still awaits an answer , in accordance with professional and ethical communication standards.
Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
Based on the costs of acquisition of Walmart by Amazon, the total transaction costs would come to B. $22,002.
<h3 /><h3>What are the total transaction costs?</h3>
Equity financing cost:
= 5.5% x 241,350.75
= $13,274.29
Debt financing cost:
= 1.5% x 241,350.75
= $3,260.26
Other transaction costs:
= $3,000
Target debt redemption premium:
= 70,242 x 3%
= $2,107.26
The total transaction costs are:
= 13,274.29 + 3,260.26 + 3,000 + 2,107.26
= $22,002
Find out more on acquisition costs at brainly.com/question/14300655
#SPJ1
Companies felt that unions were conspiracies which interfere with property right because, unions usually challenge the employers about the working conditions of their workers and the manner the employers treat their workers; they fight for the rights of the worker. Because of this, employers usually do all they can to stop unions from forming.
