Answer:
D. It might be hard for voters to really tell which candidates are truly of the "natural aristocracy."
Explanation:
The system of democracy which asserts that the best and brightest citizens (individuals of natural aristocracy) would provided proper representation is criticized because It might be hard for voters to really tell which candidates are truly of the "natural aristocracy." In a population of over 300 million people, it will be hard for the average American voter to identify individuals who are of natural aristocracy, who broke the norm and standout among their peers as such individuals may be confused by those of artificial aristocracy who have the finance, family name and obtained polished education.
Answer:
It flows south pls mark brainliest
Answer:
kids shoes spread awareness in their community about anti corruption free India there times when parents try to enroll there kids in private school so they are funds taken by the presence and that is something which is not allowed
Answer: Refers to the extent to which people are responsive to the social cues that come from the social environment
Explanation: Self-monitoring is defined by experts as traits of individuals on the basis of which they are willing and able to regulate and adapt their behaviour in accordance with social norms presented through various everyday situations and social demands. It means just how much individuals are prepared based on their capabilities but also willing to respond to social cues. In other words, self monitoring is the notion of self presentation, for which we are responsible, meaning that we monitor how we present ourselves in accordance with the requirements of society and how we will adapt our behaviour if necessary. Not everyone is ready, therefore, not everyone has the same ability to engage in self-monitoring and adjust their presentation accordingly to social demands. Not everyone is willing to do the same in the same way.
