Answer:
a) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is greater than 642.
Step-by-step explanation:
since in the question it is mentioned that the average attendance at games should be more 642 and according to this he moving the team with a larger stadium. Also the hypothesis conducted and the conclusion would be failure to deny the null hypothesis
So here the conclusion that should be made in non-technical term is that there should be no enough proof in order to support the claim that the mean attendence is more than $642
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Alske
We know the equation of a line is y=mx+b. We know the slope (m) is -2 and all we need is the intercept (b).
Since we know one point, we can plug in 6 for x and 3 for y (along with -2 for m) in our equation and then solve for b.
3= -2*6 + b
3= -12 + b
15 = b
Since we now know the intercept we can now write our equation:
y= -2x + 15
The answer is 11 sorry if I’m wrong
