1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yuri [45]
3 years ago
8

2(x+10)+10-4+5 How can I solve this

Mathematics
2 answers:
ziro4ka [17]3 years ago
6 0
2(x+10)+10-4+5
——Distribute 2(x+10) and bring everything down

2x+20+10-4+5
——Combine like terms with 20+10 and -4+5

2x+30+1
——Still combine like terms..it’ll just be with 30+1

Answer: 2x+31
Taya2010 [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

start witg parentecees, then multiplication then addind and substracting

Step-by-step explanation:

2(x+10)+10-4+5 = 2x + 20 +10 -4 +5

2x+31 is the final answer

You might be interested in
Help please!! Will give brainliest! Find the slope of the line.
Karolina [17]

The line is going up from left to right so it isn't negative, neither is it very steep. Answer - 1/5

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When making a long distance call from a certain pay phone, the first three minutes of a call cost $3.00. afterthat, each additio
motikmotik
3 + 0.45*M<=8,40. Notice the equal, because you may use all the money. Then, rearranging: M<=(8.40-3)/0.45= 12, so M<=12. Now, obviously time is positive, so you may end saying 0<=M<=12, with M=0 meaning no call! :)
4 0
2 years ago
Find the length indicated
Allushta [10]
It is 1 because 8-7=1
8 0
3 years ago
g Given the following premises: (1) a∧(b∨a) (2) ~c→~a (3) ~g→~a (4) g→e (5)~(d∨h) Prove the Conclusion: c∧~h?
KIM [24]

Answer:

See the argument below

Step-by-step explanation:

I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.

First, let's conclude c.

(1)⇒a  by simplification of conjunction

a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation

¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens

¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation

Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.

An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:

By contradiction proof, assume h is true.

h⇒d∨h by addition

(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.    

8 0
3 years ago
Is 4.3 repeating bigger than 4.3?
Marianna [84]
Yes it would be since 4.3 repeating has tons of 3's repeating.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Berenice decides to look at a horizon unwired phone plan. The plan has a monthly charge and an activation fee. With this plan sh
    14·1 answer
  • Find the equation of a line passing through (-2,4) and ( 0,8)
    6·1 answer
  • Using the substitution method to solve the system. 5x+2y=5 x=3y-16
    11·2 answers
  • If possible, prove that AB||CD. If not possible, show and explain why​
    9·1 answer
  • What is the product of x/3 and 6/x when x does not equal 0
    6·1 answer
  • In your sock drawer you have 6 blue, 7 gray, and 2 black socks. Half asleep one morning you grab 2 socks at random and put them
    14·1 answer
  • Help me please... Anyone out there... I need help.....
    15·1 answer
  • Need help with 13, 14, 15
    13·1 answer
  • Write the equation for the line in slope-intercept form.
    7·1 answer
  • PLS help i having problem with this one
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!