Answer:
B. agreements between two or more parties
Explanation:
if you were to sign a contract for something huge and you were broke the contract before you had finish the time that you had signed whom ever you signed it could end in a law sue and maybe even jail time.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
Letter B is correct. <u>Narrowing the gap between theory and practice.</u>
Explanation:
Case study is an investigative methodological approach applied to simple or applied social sciences. It is carried out through the use of different qualitative methods for the collection of data and information relevant to the foundation of the research. The qualitative method is the most appropriate in a case study, as it occurs through subjective and not substantially statistical means of in-depth analysis of relevant factors in an event, an individual, an institution, a group and others.
Case studies can be classified as:
- exploratory,
- descriptive, or
- explanatory.
So it is correct to state that the purpose of the case study is to reduce the difference between theory and practice. Because the analysis of the information collected and the variables and patterns found will provide subsidies for the discussion and better understanding and reasoning between what happens between the theory and the practice analyzed in the case study.
Answer:
it is not allocatively efficient
Explanation:
Monopoly is a market condition where one seller has all the market share. This leads to an inefficient market structure, an increase in the prices of goods and services and abnormal profits. A problem with adopting a fair return polity for a natural monopoly is that it is not allocatively efficient. In a monopoly, goods and services are not produced to help the economy or people.
Tab Color.........................
Answer:
14.34%
Explanation:
To find the percentage of returned surveys over the total we divide and then multiply:
(717/5000)*100= 14.34%
The response rate appears to be low because it is less than 50% (which would be 2500 return surveys). Some statistical studies agree that 30 is the minimum number of observations a study must have, but this number does not ensure statistically significant results.
The problem with a very low response rate is that survey´s answers does not significant represent the study population characteristics and so we cannot make inferences, correlations or regressions that are statistically significant. In this case, the conclusions that scientists make about association between the left-handed population and right-handed population with the use of cell phone calls could be wrong or not represent the population characteristics, which means answers are not trustful.
