Answer: The answer is D). Garbage Purchase Program
Explanation: Lack of budget for a standard recycling plant lead Curitiba to initiate the Garbage Exchange Programme where complementary currencies are used to reward people for separating their organic and non-organic recyclable wastes and bringing them to waste stations, where they can be exchanged for bus tickets, food, and school-books.
Answer:
The answer that best fits into this sentence would be "denied the opportunity to obtain"
Explanation:
This is because Melvin Tumin was a firm believer on social stratification. This is a system that classifies people into different groups that depend on their wealth, income, social status and derived power. This makes it extremely difficult for underprivileged kids to achieve their dreams of becoming successful in a certain profession because in order to get to that level they need certain resources and contacts that are only available to higher class groups.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
A)
Explanation:
The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.
Gerrymandering is the redrawing of voting district so a political party can gain an advantage
The correct answer is what you had for dinner.
According to Craik and Lockhart's l<span>evels of processing model, we are more likely to remember information that is meaningful, and deeply or thoroughly processed and encoded. In this instance, the food you had with your parents is more likely to be remembered compared to whether you encountered a traffic light and stopped. This is because dinner with loved ones is more meaningful and engages more senses such as visual (how the food looked), olfactory (how it smelled), taste of the food, and touch (the texture of the food). On the other hand, being stopped at a traffic light is not as deeply processed or encoded since it is not very meaningful and does not engage as many senses.</span>
