Answer:
Both sides suffered heavy casualties.
Explanation:
Took the test !
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
A) Alter its own spending, taxes, and/or the amount of money in circulation.
Explanation:
In situations of economic warming and inflation the government can act to influence citizens' spending to cool down economic activity to lower inflation. Inflation is a monetary phenomenon caused by excess currency in the economy. Thus, the government can reduce its spending, because it is an important player, which makes government consumption has a significant weight in economic warming. In addition, the government can take steps to curb citizen consumption through restrictive policies such as raising taxes. Finally, the government may sell government bonds to wipe out the monetary base. When the government sells bonds, people stop consuming at present to earn future income from public bonds. Thus, the government causes the money in circulation to decrease.
The council members of the Jewish council would not want to enter Pilate's judgment hall because they could not think of a specific charge. They also would not want to defile and unable to eat on the pass over.
