<span>If these are the missing choices:
</span>A : the Securities and Exchange Commission, income principle
<span>B : GAAP, revenue recognition principle
C : GAAP, expense recognition principle
D : the IRS, tax principle </span><span>
My answer is: </span><span>B : GAAP, revenue recognition principle
</span><span>
The cash-basis is not in accordance with GAAP, and mahogany is in violation of the REVENUE RECOGNITION PRINCIPLE.
GAAP refers to Generally Accepted Accounting Principle.
It is stated that income must be recognized when it is earned not when cash is received. Because the company is using cash-basis, they will only report income earned on July 12 when they received the money not when they earned it which is before their fiscal year ending June 30.
They should recognized receivables from customers before closing the books for the fiscal year. </span>
Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct option is (d).
is quite strict, with the carrier being liable for all losses except those caused by certain specified perils.
Explanation:
The legal liability of a common carrier for damage to or loss of goods in its custody is that he takes full responsibility for the goods except those caused by certain specified perils.
Answer:
C $30,000
Explanation:
. A $30,000 result has a 35 percent chance of occurring, but the entity cumulatively has a 55 percent chance of receiving at least a $30,000 tax benefit. As a result, $30,000 is the appropriate amount to recognize.
Answer:
Hope I am giving you the right answer
